Arizona Basketball

Colorado got its “payback” but Arizona has other concerns to address





ARIZONA PRODUCTIVITY RATING
[table “” not found /]

GLOSSARY:
G: Games played. S: Number of starts.
BP: Bench points. A player gets three points if he is first off the bench, two if second and one if third. Shows Sean Miller’s rotation.
COL: Productivity points against Colorado
CMIN: Minutes played against Colorado
PP: Productivity Points (Points, assists, rebounds, steals, blocked shots, FGs made, FTs made added together and then subtracted by missed FGs, missed FTs, personal fouls and turnovers)
TMIN: Minutes played overall
PR: Productivity rating per minute played (Productivity points divided by minutes played)
NOTE: Player must average at least 10 minutes a game to be listed in primary rotation


[table “” not found /]
Colorado coach Tad Boyle said before the game it would be a payback game only if the Buffaloes won but after the victory over Arizona, he said it was not  a revenge game

Colorado coach Tad Boyle said it would be a payback game only if the Buffaloes won, but after the victory over Arizona, he said it was not a revenge game

Colorado coach Tad Boyle looked annoyed Thursday night as he saw fans rush the court at the Coors Events Center following the Buffaloes’ 71-58 convincing win over No. 9 Arizona.

He motioned toward them to not pour on to the court before shaking UA coach Sean Miller’s hand. The fans stormed the court regardless despite Colorado being the defending Pac-12 tournament champion, beating the Wildcats in the process last March in Los Angeles. The Buffaloes also have a 3-2 record against the Wildcats since joining the conference last season.

Colorado got its redemption against Arizona after a controversial 92-83 loss in overtime Jan. 3 at McKale Center. The Buffaloes did not need a prayer by Sabatino Chen off the backboard at the buzzer Thursday night. Boyle said during Colorado’s pre-game radio interview: “It is only a payback game if we win.”

Is it a payback against Arizona, or the refs who ruled Chen’s shot a fraction of second too late in regulation after viewing a replay monitor for five minutes? Colorado blew a 10-point lead with less than two minutes remaining to put itself in that precarious position.

“What makes this win sweet is it has nothing to do with revenge,” Boyle was quoted as saying by the Associated Press after Thursday’s game.

“It has everything to do with the respect I have for Arizona and Sean Miller and their basketball program. We beat a top 10 team in the country that’s legitimate and they’re going to win a lot of games as this season unfolds. And I think if we play the way we did tonight we will, too.”

Arizona (20-4 overall, 8-4 in the Pac-12) continued its trend of struggling on the front end of a weekend road series with its 71-58 loss to Colorado. The Wildcats’ primary eight-man rotation posted a season-low 60 productivity points (see glossary for productivity points) against the Buffaloes. The previous lows included a Thursday loss at Oregon (65 productivity points) and Thursday win at Washington (66 productivity points).

In the following games — at Oregon State and Washington State — the Wildcats responded with victories posting a season-high 116 productivity points against the Beavers and 93 against the Cougars. Oregon State and Washington State are in the bottom rung of the conference, as is Sunday’s opponent Utah.

*****

Angelo Chol had Arizona's highest productivity rating against Colorado

Angelo Chol had Arizona’s highest productivity rating against Colorado

One promising development was reserve forward Angelo Chol, the No. 9 player in the rotation this season, posting 14 productivity points in 20 minutes. Chol had the UA’s best productivity rating (.700). The only player who had more productivity points was Solomon Hill with 16, but Hill played 36 minutes to achieve that mark and finished with a .444 rating.

Chol, a sophomore, showed fundamental interior post moves reminiscent of Joseph Blair and Sean Rooks, one that resulted in an emphatic slam dunk in the first half. Chol was 4 of 6 from the field. Freshmen frontcourt starters Kaleb Tarczewski and Brandon Ashley struggled to get into the offensive flow taking only seven shots overall.

Arizona made a concerted effort to get the ball to Tarczewski, but he occasionally got trapped, bringing the ball low against defenders before going up. Ashley, like the entire team, found it difficult matching against Colorado’s speed and athleticism. In the two games against the Buffaloes, Ashley played 33 minutes and finished with a productivity total of minus-1.

“They’re a very fast team,” Hill was quoted as saying by the Associated Press. “When those guys get going they are one of the fastest teams in Pac-12 play. When they’re making shots they are probably the most deadly team in the Pac 12

“They are the best defensive team in the Pac 12, so they are a very deadly team, especially at home and if we don’t match their intensity, it’s going to be a long night.”

*****

Miller, acknowledging the quality of the opponent, was quoted as saying by the AP: “It’s never as bad as it seems and the sky isn’t falling.”

Arizona’s four losses are against teams — Oregon, UCLA, Cal and Colorado — that have a combined overall record of 70-28. The Wildcats’ NCAA resume still includes wins over Miami, Florida, San Diego State, Colorado and Southern Miss. Every Pac-12 team, including league-leader Oregon, would desire Arizona’s RPI (No. 9 entering Thursday’s game) and strength of schedule (No. 10).

While the sky is not falling, the same can’t be said of the production from some of Miller’s key players.

After the victory over Colorado in the first matchup, senior reserve Kevin Parrom led the UA with a .712 productivity rating. He is now fifth on the team with a .582 mark. Nick Johnson led the Wildcats with a .651 rating after the victory over Washington State on Feb. 2. In the three games since against Stanford, Cal and Colorado, he has managed only 28 productivity points in 99 minutes (a rating of only .283). His overall rating is down to .602.

Nick Johnson's productivity rating has dropped 50 points in the last three games

Nick Johnson’s productivity rating has dropped 49 points in the last three games

Flu-like symptoms affected Johnson during the Washington State game and the following week. Now it appears Johnson just needs to get back in sync and play with a bounce again.

The Wildcats have time to make the necessary improvements against league coaches, who know that Arizona’s production on offense comes primarily from the shooting of Mark Lyons, Hill and Johnson. They combine for 30.3 field-goal attempts a game compared to only 9.5 by Tarczewski and Ashley.

Arizona’s NCAA title team of 1996-97 relied heavily on the scoring of perimeter players Mike Bibby, Miles Simon and Michael Dickerson but the Wildcats needed the athleticism of Bennett Davison around the basket primarily for putbacks off offensive rebounds and the interior scoring potential of A.J. Bramlett.

Davison and Bramlett were also more developed and experienced than Ashley and Tarczewski. Davison was in his first season after transferring from a junior college and Bramlett was a sophomore. Bramlett never had a season in which he shot less than 51.1 percent from the field. Tarczewski is shooting 49.1 percent, but only 40.7 percent in Pac-12 games.

In due time, Tarczewski will develop, perhaps becoming more of dominant go-to kind of player toward the end of next season. His best days are ahead. The same goes for Arizona and Miller.

*****

The Wildcats were out-rebounded for the fourth time in the last seven games, another area of concern for Miller. Colorado’s Andre Roberson, the Pac-12’s leading rebounder, pulled down 13 — almost more than Arizona’s entire starting frontcourt of Hill, Ashley and Tarczewski (which combined had 15).

Defensive Rebounding Percentage (DRB%): Determined by dividing Arizona’s defensive rebounds (19 against Colorado) by the opposition’s offensive rebounds (Colorado had only nine — it shot 59 percent in the second half) added to Arizona’s defensive rebounds (19) — 19/(9 + 19) = 67.9 percent.

Offensive Rebounding Percentage (ORB%): Determined by taking Arizona’s offensive rebound total (11) divided by that total (11) and the defensive rebounds of the opponent (22 for Colorado) — 11/(11 + 22) = 33.3 percent.

Ideal marks are 72 percent DRB% and 38 percent ORB%.

NEXT UP: Arizona at Utah, Feb. 17
BOX SCORES/PRODUCTIVITY LEADER:
Colorado 71, Arizona 58
— Angelo Chol 14 PP/20 MIN
California 77, Arizona 69
— Brandon Ashley 21 PP/29 MIN
Arizona 73, Stanford 66
— Mark Lyons 41 PP/36 MIN
Arizona 79, Washington State 65
— Mark Lyons 22 PP/23 MIN
Arizona 57, Washington 53
— Nick Johnson 26 PP/34 MIN
Arizona 74, USC 50
— Solomon Hill 22 PP/24 MIN
UCLA 84, Arizona 73
— Nick Johnson 29 PP/33 MIN
Arizona 71, Arizona State 54
— Mark Lyons 34 PP/31 MIN
Arizona 80, Oregon State 70
— Brandon Ashley 19 PP/22 MIN
Oregon 70, Arizona 66
— Mark Lyons 24 PP/37 MIN
Arizona 60, Utah 57
— Solomon Hill 29 PP/35 MIN
Arizona 92, Colorado 83 (OT)
— Kevin Parrom 28 PP/34 MIN
Arizona 68, San Diego State 67
— Kevin Parrom 28 PP/26 MIN
Arizona 69, Miami 50
— Kevin Parrom 21 PP/21 MIN
Arizona 73, East Tennessee State 53
— Brandon Ashley 27 PP/22 MIN
Arizona 89, Oral Roberts 64
— Grant Jerrett 24 PP/21 MIN
Arizona 65, Florida 64
— Solomon Hill 31 PP/37 MIN
Arizona 66, Clemson 54
— Mark Lyons 30 PP/33 MIN
Arizona 63, Southern Mississippi 55
— Kevin Parrom 19 PP/30 MIN
Arizona 85, Texas Tech 57
— Solomon Hill 26 PP/26 MIN
Arizona 93, NAU 50
— Nick Johnson 27 PP/22 MIN
Arizona 94, Long Beach State 72
— Brandon Ashley 40 PP/24 MIN
Arizona 72, UTEP 51
— Mark Lyons 21 PP/25 MIN
Arizona 82, Charleston Southern 73
— Brandon Ashley 26 PP/24 MIN

DEFENSIVE/OFFENSIVE REBOUNDING%
[table “” not found /]

Site publisher, writer and editor Javier Morales is a former Arizona Press Club award winner

[rps-paypal]



To Top